Follow on RSS
-
Recent Posts
- The Source List for the 1790 Table of Usages of the Term “Aufklärung”
- The Word “Enlightenment”: A German Table of Usages from 1790
- The Making and the Marketing of the Philosophische Fragmente (Part II)
- The Making and the Marketing of the Philosophische Fragmente: A Note on the Early History of the Dialectic of Enlightenment (Part I)
- Images of Enlightenment: The Lamp and the Sun
- Adorno
- Anti-Jacobin Review
- anti-jacobins
- Arendt
- Begriffsgeschichte
- Bentham
- Berlinische Monatsschrift
- Blumenberg
- Boston
- Cassirer
- Counter-Enlightenment
- Culture Industry
- Declaration of Independence
- Dialectic of Enlightenment
- Diderot
- Edmund Burke
- enlightenment
- Epicurus
- Exile
- Exile Studies
- Foucault
- George Adler
- German Museum
- Habermas
- Hamann
- Hans Blumenberg
- Hegel
- History of Concepts
- Horace
- Horkheimer
- Isaiah Berlin
- James Gillray
- Jefferson
- John Quincy Adams
- Kant
- Koselleck
- Light
- Lionel Trilling
- Locke
- Los Angeles
- MacIntyre
- Melville
- Modernity
- Moses Mendelssohn
- Music
- Ngrams
- Nietzsche
- OED
- Pagden
- philosophy
- Pocock
- politics
- Popper
- rants
- religion
- reviews
- romanticism
- Schmitt
- scientism
- T. S. Eliot
- Thomas Mann
- translation
- Virgil Thomson
- Voltaire
- Whittaker Chambers
- William Barrett
- Wokler
Blogroll
- 18th Century Religion, Literature, and Culture
- Boston 1775
- Box 3, Spool 5
- Creative Communities, 1750-1830
- Crooker Timber
- Dan Cohen's Digital Humanities Blog
- Defoe's Review
- Ether Wave Propaganda
- Foucault News
- Habermasian Reflections
- Justin Erik Halldór Smith
- PhiloBiblos
- Political Theory – Habermas and Rawls
- Prochronisms
- Progressive Geographies
- Public Domain Review
- Public Reason
- Republic of Letters
- Sapping Attention
- Stockerblog
- Taking Note
- The Long Eighteenth
- The Philosopher's Stone (Robert Paul Wolff)
- Waggish
-
Persistent Enlightenment by James Schmidt is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Tag Archives: Kant
Foucault and Habermas on Kant, Modernity, and Enlightenment (The Debate that Never Was, Part IV)
The aim of my series of posts on the so-called “Foucault/Habermas Debate” has been to move the focus away from the discussion of the differences in their general approaches and return it to the more modest concerns that lay at … Continue reading
Misunderstanding Foucault — Foucault. Habermas, and the Debate that Never Was (Part III)
My last post on the so-called “Foucault/Habermas Debate” focused on the eulogy JürgenHabermas wrote in the wake of Michel Foucault’s death. The main theoretical claim of the eulogy was that Foucault, the one-time critic of the “Enlightenment project” (a project … Continue reading
Habermas’ Foucault — The Debate that Never Was (Part II)
As I discussed in my previous post, what has come to known as the “Foucault/Habermas Debate” has largely been the creation of parties other than Foucault and Habermas. They met only once, in March 1983, when Habermas visited Paris to … Continue reading
On Foucault’s Review of Cassirer’s Philosophy of the Enlightenment
It is unfortunate that no one has gotten around to translating Michel Foucault’s 1966 review of the French translation of Ernst Cassirer’s Philosophie der Aufklärung.1 Granted, it is a short text and – prior to its reprinting in Foucault’s Dits … Continue reading
Out of Unmündigkeit – Final Thoughts on Translating Kant on Enlightenment
I will take my leave from this series of posts on the translation of the first sentence of Kant’s answer to the question “What is enlightenment?” with a consideration of how translators have handled Ausgang,the word that characterizes the passage … Continue reading
“Voluntary Nonage”? — Translating Kant on Enlightenment (Part 4)
Kant’s talents as a writer tend to be greatly underestimated. Granted, the Three Critiques are no walk in the park, but even when Kant’s prose struggles because it is forced to do rather difficult things, there are striking passages (e.g. … Continue reading
Making Sense of “Aufklärung” – Translating Kant, Part III
I began this series of posts more or less as a lark, thinking that I’d look at how my fellow translators of Kant’s response to the question “What is enlightenment?” handled the opening sentence. But this exercise turned out to … Continue reading
